<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hello world!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixthperiod.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/hello-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixthperiod.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/hello-world/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sixthperiod</title>
		<link>http://sixthperiod.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/hello-world/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>sixthperiod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Hello Mr WordPress and sixthperiod, I think you are both confused because who/what refers to itself as &quot;Hi, this is a comment?&quot; At best that seems redundant and at worst horrible erronous (this lack of spell check could be problematic) for what introduces itself by &quot;this is ...?&quot; I personally cannot stand something refering to itself in the third person. Moreover, this unity making all of us have the same username could be a poor choice for how do we know who submitted the comment - eg if its even worth reading or not. So I am sixthperiod, or rather (in the spirit of conformity) this is sixthperiod, finally done with my (urgh, his) first blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mr WordPress and sixthperiod, I think you are both confused because who/what refers to itself as &#8220;Hi, this is a comment?&#8221; At best that seems redundant and at worst horrible erronous (this lack of spell check could be problematic) for what introduces itself by &#8220;this is &#8230;?&#8221; I personally cannot stand something refering to itself in the third person. Moreover, this unity making all of us have the same username could be a poor choice for how do we know who submitted the comment &#8211; eg if its even worth reading or not. So I am sixthperiod, or rather (in the spirit of conformity) this is sixthperiod, finally done with my (urgh, his) first blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixthperiod</title>
		<link>http://sixthperiod.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/hello-world/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>sixthperiod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Well hey there comment! This is a confused wordpress-er. How are you today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well hey there comment! This is a confused wordpress-er. How are you today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>http://sixthperiod.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#039; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#8217; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
